What is the main difference between Harness and Woodpecker CI?

Harness and Woodpecker CI are both ci/cd platforms but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Harness or Woodpecker CI?

The choice between Harness and Woodpecker CI depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Harness to Woodpecker CI?

Migration between Harness and Woodpecker CI is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

CodeRabbit – The leading AI Code Review platform. Ship better quality code in 50% less time, with 90% fewer bugs.

Learn More

Harness vs Woodpecker CI

Learn how Harness and Woodpecker CI differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ci/cd platforms is best for you.

Harness

Streamline code delivery with an open-source CI/CD platform featuring Git integration, fast pipelines, and hosted development environments.

Visit Harness Read more

38,189stars+601(+1.6%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
9 hours ago
Repository age
13 years
Version
v2.28.2
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
harness/harness

Woodpecker CI

Open-source CI/CD platform using Docker containers for pipeline execution. Create multiple workflows, extend with plugins, and enjoy free lifetime access.

Visit Woodpecker CI Read more

7,790stars+180(+2.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
10 hours ago
Repository age
7 years
Version
v3.18.0
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
woodpecker-ci/woodpecker

Sponsor Woodpecker CI ongithub.com

Detailed Comparison

Both Harness and Woodpecker CI have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Harness wins

Community & Popularity

Harness significantly outpaces Woodpecker CI in community adoption with 38,189 stars compared to 7,790 stars on GitHub. This 4.9x difference suggests Harness has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Harness has 3,379 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Woodpecker CI wins

Growth Momentum

Woodpecker CI is growing faster, adding 180 stars in the last 30 days (+2.4%) against adding 601 stars for Harness (+1.6%). Woodpecker CI is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Harness last updated 9 hours ago and Woodpecker CI 10 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Harness uses SCSS while Woodpecker CI leverages CSS, Vue.

Harness wins

Project Maturity

Harness has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Woodpecker CI which began 7 years ago. This 5.2-year head start suggests Harness may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in CI/CD Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Harness also focuses on PaaS & Deployment Tools.

Comparable

Hosting & Deployment

Both Harness and Woodpecker CI offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.

Other tool comparisons to consider