Semaphore vs Woodpecker CI
Learn how Semaphore and Woodpecker CI differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ci/cd platforms is best for you.
Learn how Semaphore and Woodpecker CI differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ci/cd platforms is best for you.
Semaphore
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.5.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
semaphoreio/semaphore
Woodpecker CI
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 hours agoRepository age
8 yearsVersion
v3.19.0License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
woodpecker-ci/woodpecker
Detailed Comparison
Woodpecker CI appears to have several advantages over Semaphore, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Woodpecker CI appears to have several advantages over Semaphore, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Woodpecker CI significantly outpaces Semaphore in community adoption with 7,978 stars compared to 1,620 stars on GitHub. This 4.9x difference suggests Woodpecker CI has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Woodpecker CI has 705 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Semaphore and Woodpecker CI are moving at much the same rate, adding 23 stars and adding 131 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.4% vs +1.7%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Semaphore last updated 1 day ago and Woodpecker CI 10 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Semaphore uses Python, Ruby, Elixir while Woodpecker CI leverages Vue.
Project Maturity
Woodpecker CI has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Semaphore which began 2 years ago. This 5.9-year head start suggests Woodpecker CI may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Woodpecker CI is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Semaphore's license terms are not publicly specified.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in CI/CD Platforms.
Hosting & Deployment
Both Semaphore and Woodpecker CI offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Sent – Messaging Infrastructure for Developers. One API for SMS, WhatsApp, and RCS across 190+ countries.