Ad
Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.Learn More
Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.Learn how Forgejo and Gitea differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these git platforms is best for you.
Gitea appears to have several advantages over Forgejo, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Gitea significantly outpaces Forgejo in community adoption with 57,114 stars compared to 5,217 stars on GitHub. This 10.9x difference suggests Gitea has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Gitea has 6,952 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Forgejo last updated 9 hours ago and Gitea 9 hours ago.
Gitea has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Forgejo which began 4 years ago. This 6.1-year head start suggests Gitea may have more mature features and established processes.
Gitea is licensed under MIT, while Forgejo's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Git Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Forgejo also focuses on Version Control & Collaboration.
Both Forgejo and Gitea offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Giteavs
GogsActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Repository
License
Self-hosted
Repository
