Learn how Forgejo and Gitea differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these git platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsSelf-hosted
YesRepository
forgejo/forgejo
Last 30 days
Last commit
16 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
v28.3.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
go-gitea/gitea
Gitea appears to have several advantages over Forgejo, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Gitea significantly outpaces Forgejo in community adoption with 58,954 stars compared to 5,796 stars on GitHub. This 10.2x difference suggests Gitea has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Gitea has 7,370 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Forgejo is growing faster, adding 186 stars in the last 30 days (+3.3%) against adding 569 stars for Gitea (+1%). Forgejo is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Forgejo last updated 10 hours ago and Gitea 16 hours ago.
Gitea has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Forgejo which began 4 years ago. This 6.1-year head start suggests Gitea may have more mature features and established processes.
Gitea is licensed under MIT, while Forgejo's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Git Platforms.
Both Forgejo and Gitea offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.