Learn how Forgejo and Gitea differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these git platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Gitea appears to have several advantages over Forgejo, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Gitea significantly outpaces Forgejo in community adoption with 57,496 stars compared to 5,331 stars on GitHub. This 10.8x difference suggests Gitea has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Gitea has 7,018 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Forgejo is growing faster, adding 180 stars in the last 30 days (+3.5%) against adding 566 stars for Gitea (+1%). Forgejo is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Forgejo last updated 9 hours ago and Gitea 8 hours ago.
Gitea has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Forgejo which began 4 years ago. This 6.1-year head start suggests Gitea may have more mature features and established processes.
Gitea is licensed under MIT, while Forgejo's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Git Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Forgejo also focuses on Version Control & Collaboration.
Both Forgejo and Gitea offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.