Learn how Forgecode and OpenCode differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

OpenCode appears to have several advantages over Forgecode, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenCode significantly outpaces Forgecode in community adoption with 201,301 stars compared to 7,505 stars on GitHub. This 26.8x difference suggests OpenCode has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenCode has 26,075 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenCode is growing faster, adding 11,425 stars in the last 30 days (+6%) against adding 41 stars for Forgecode (+0.5%). OpenCode is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Forgecode last updated 12 hours ago and OpenCode 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Rust. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Forgecode uses Bash, Python while OpenCode leverages Typescript, JSX, Tauri.
Both projects started around the same time, with Forgecode beginning 2 years ago and OpenCode 1 year ago.
OpenCode uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Forgecode's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Forgecode also focuses on AI Coding Assistants while OpenCode extends into AI Coding Agents.