Ad
Sent – Messaging Infrastructure for Developers. One API for SMS, WhatsApp, and RCS across 190+ countries.Learn More
Sent – Messaging Infrastructure for Developers. One API for SMS, WhatsApp, and RCS across 190+ countries.Sent – Messaging Infrastructure for Developers. One API for SMS, WhatsApp, and RCS across 190+ countries.Learn how Forgecode and OpenCode differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agents is best for you.
OpenCode appears to have several advantages over Forgecode, particularly in popularity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenCode significantly outpaces Forgecode in community adoption with 193,756 stars compared to 7,479 stars on GitHub. This 25.9x difference suggests OpenCode has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenCode has 24,772 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Forgecode last updated 7 hours ago and OpenCode 5 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Rust. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Forgecode uses Bash, Python while OpenCode leverages Typescript, JSX, Tauri.
Both projects started around the same time, with Forgecode beginning 2 years ago and OpenCode 1 year ago.
OpenCode uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Forgecode's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agents, AI Coding Assistants.
Forgecodevs
AiderActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
License
Repository
