Learn how Flowise AI and n8n differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
This repository was archived by the owner and is no longer maintained.
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

n8n appears to have several advantages over Flowise AI, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
n8n significantly outpaces Flowise AI in community adoption with 202,607 stars compared to 55,398 stars on GitHub. This 3.7x difference suggests n8n has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, n8n has 60,422 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
n8n is growing faster, adding 4,202 stars in the last 30 days (+2.1%) against adding 399 stars for Flowise AI (+0.7%). n8n is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Flowise AI last updated 14 days ago and n8n 6 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Flowise AI uses JSX while n8n leverages Bash, Vue.
n8n has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Flowise AI which began 3 years ago. This 3.8-year head start suggests n8n may have more mature features and established processes.
Flowise AI is licensed under Apache-2.0, while n8n's license terms are not publicly specified.
Flowise AI also focuses on AI Agent Platforms while n8n extends into Low-Code/No-Code, Workflow Automation.
Both Flowise AI and n8n offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.