Learn how Flowise AI and Langflow differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai agent platforms is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Langflow appears to have several advantages over Flowise AI, particularly in popularity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Langflow leads in popularity with 147,522 stars vs 52,403 stars for Flowise AI. The 182% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Flowise AI has 24,237 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Flowise AI last updated 16 hours ago and Langflow 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Flowise AI uses SCSS while Langflow leverages Bash, Python.
Both projects started around the same time, with Flowise AI beginning 3 years ago and Langflow 3 years ago.
Langflow uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Flowise AI's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Agent Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Flowise AI also focuses on AI Development Platforms while Langflow extends into Low-Code/No-Code, LLM Application Frameworks.
Both Flowise AI and Langflow offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.