Learn how Dify and Langflow differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Dify and Langflow have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Dify and Langflow show comparable community engagement with 138,499 and 147,162 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Dify has 21,712 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Dify last updated 1 hour ago and Langflow 1 hour ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Dify uses Next.js, SCSS, PHP.
Both projects started around the same time, with Dify beginning 3 years ago and Langflow 3 years ago.
Langflow is licensed under MIT, while Dify's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code, LLM Application Frameworks. However, they also have distinct specializations: Langflow extends into AI Agent Platforms.
Both Dify and Langflow offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.