Fli.so vs Shlink
Learn how Fli.so and Shlink differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.
Learn how Fli.so and Shlink differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.
Fli.so
Stars
503Forks
36Last commit
8 months agoRepository age
1 yearLicense
AGPL-3.0
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 8 months and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .
Shlink
Auto-fetched .
Detailed Comparison
Shlink appears to have several advantages over Fli.so, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Shlink appears to have several advantages over Fli.so, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Shlink significantly outpaces Fli.so in community adoption with 4,922 stars compared to 503 stars on GitHub. This 9.8x difference suggests Shlink has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Shlink has 385 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Development Activity
Shlink shows more recent development activity with its last commit 7 days ago, while Fli.so was last updated 8 months ago. This suggests Shlink is being more actively maintained.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Fli.so uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, SvelteKit while Shlink leverages PHP.
Project Maturity
Shlink has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Fli.so which began 1 year ago. This 8.7-year head start suggests Shlink may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Shlink uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Fli.so's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Link Management & Shorteners.
Hosting & Deployment
Shlink provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Fli.so may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.