Learn how Firecrawl and Maxun differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these scraping platforms & sdks is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Firecrawl appears to have several advantages over Maxun, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Firecrawl significantly outpaces Maxun in community adoption with 169,544 stars compared to 17,189 stars on GitHub. This 9.9x difference suggests Firecrawl has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Firecrawl has 9,461 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Firecrawl is growing faster, adding 16,068 stars in the last 30 days (+10%) against adding 571 stars for Maxun (+3.4%). Firecrawl is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Firecrawl last updated 9 hours ago and Maxun 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Firecrawl uses Python, Golang, Rust.
Both projects started around the same time, with Firecrawl beginning 2 years ago and Maxun 3 years ago.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Scraping Platforms & SDKs. However, they also have distinct specializations: Firecrawl also focuses on Web Crawlers.
Both Firecrawl and Maxun offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.