What is the main difference between fastCRW and Firecrawl?

fastCRW and Firecrawl are both scraping platforms & sdks but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: fastCRW or Firecrawl?

The choice between fastCRW and Firecrawl depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from fastCRW to Firecrawl?

Migration between fastCRW and Firecrawl is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Windshift – The self-hosted platform that replaces Jira.

Learn more

fastCRW vs Firecrawl

Learn how fastCRW and Firecrawl differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these scraping platforms & sdks is best for you.

fastCRW

Web data API for AI agents that searches, scrapes, crawls, maps, extracts and monitors pages, returning clean markdown or JSON. Runs managed or self-hosted.

Visit fastCRW Read more

1,178stars+105(+9.8%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
14 hours ago
Repository age
8 months
Version
v0.39.0
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
us/crw

Firecrawl

API for AI agents to search, scrape, crawl, and interact with the live web, returning clean Markdown, structured JSON, or screenshots from any page.

Visit Firecrawl Read more

195,414stars+10,352(+5.6%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
9 hours ago
Repository age
3 years
Version
v2.11.0
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
mendableai/firecrawl

Detailed Comparison

Both fastCRW and Firecrawl have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Firecrawl wins

Community & Popularity

Firecrawl significantly outpaces fastCRW in community adoption with 195,414 stars compared to 1,178 stars on GitHub. This 165.9x difference suggests Firecrawl has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Firecrawl has 10,309 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

fastCRW wins

Growth Momentum

fastCRW is growing faster, adding 105 stars in the last 30 days (+9.8%) against adding 10,352 stars for Firecrawl (+5.6%). fastCRW is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with fastCRW last updated 14 hours ago and Firecrawl 9 hours ago.

Firecrawl wins

Project Maturity

Firecrawl has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to fastCRW which began 8 months ago. This 1.9-year head start suggests Firecrawl may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable