Learn how fastCRW and OpenSERP differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these scraping platforms & sdks is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
16 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v0.8.15License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
karust/openserp
Both fastCRW and OpenSERP have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with fastCRW having 1,178 stars and OpenSERP having 1,499 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, OpenSERP has 180 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
fastCRW is growing faster, adding 105 stars in the last 30 days (+9.8%) against adding 75 stars for OpenSERP (+5.3%). fastCRW is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with fastCRW last updated 14 hours ago and OpenSERP 16 hours ago.
OpenSERP has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to fastCRW which began 8 months ago. This 2.7-year head start suggests OpenSERP may have more mature features and established processes.
OpenSERP uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than fastCRW's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Scraping Platforms & SDKs. However, they also have distinct specializations: fastCRW also focuses on Web Crawlers.
Both fastCRW and OpenSERP offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.