Ad
 
Learn More

Faved vs Linkwarden

Learn how Faved and Linkwarden differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these bookmark managers is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Faved

Faved

A private, open-source bookmark manager for power users and large libraries, with a powerful, clutter-free UI.
1,328stars+20(+1.5%)

Last 30 days

  • Last commit


    2 months ago
  • Repository age


    1 year
  • Version


    v2.10.0
  • License


    MIT
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
  • Repository


    denho/faved
Screenshot of Faved
Favicon of Linkwarden

Linkwarden

Open-source platform to collect, organize, and preserve webpages with powerful collaboration features
20,123stars+348(+1.8%)

Last 30 days

  • Last commit


    4 days ago
  • Repository age


    5 years
  • Version


    v2.16.3
  • License


    AGPL-3.0
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
  • Repository


    linkwarden
Screenshot of Linkwarden

Detailed Comparison

Linkwarden appears to have several advantages over Faved, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Linkwarden wins
Community & Popularity

Linkwarden significantly outpaces Faved in community adoption with 20,123 stars compared to 1,328 stars on GitHub. This 15.2x difference suggests Linkwarden has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Linkwarden has 866 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Comparable
Growth Momentum

Faved and Linkwarden are moving at much the same rate, adding 20 stars and adding 348 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.5% vs +1.8%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.

Linkwarden wins
Development Activity

Linkwarden shows more recent development activity with its last commit 4 days ago, while Faved was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Linkwarden is being more actively maintained.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Faved uses PHP while Linkwarden leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, C, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB.

Linkwarden wins
Project Maturity

Linkwarden has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Faved which began 1 year ago. This 3.2-year head start suggests Linkwarden may have more mature features and established processes.

Faved wins
Licensing

Faved uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Linkwarden's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Bookmark Managers. However, they also have distinct specializations: Linkwarden extends into Read-it-Later & Knowledge Hubs.

Comparable
Hosting & Deployment

Both Faved and Linkwarden offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.