Linkwarden vs Readeck
Learn how Linkwarden and Readeck differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these read-it-later & knowledge hubs is best for you.
Learn how Linkwarden and Readeck differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these read-it-later & knowledge hubs is best for you.
Linkwarden
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v2.16.1License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
linkwarden/linkwarden
Readeck
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
5 yearsRepository
readeck/readeck
Detailed Comparison
Both Linkwarden and Readeck have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Linkwarden and Readeck have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Linkwarden significantly outpaces Readeck in community adoption with 19,529 stars compared to 1,078 stars on GitHub. This 18.1x difference suggests Linkwarden has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Linkwarden has 826 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Readeck is growing faster, adding 42 stars in the last 30 days (+4.1%) against adding 513 stars for Linkwarden (+2.7%). Readeck is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Linkwarden last updated 8 hours ago and Readeck 3 days ago.
Project Maturity
Readeck has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Linkwarden which began 4 years ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests Readeck may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Linkwarden is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Readeck's license terms are not publicly specified.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Read-it-Later & Knowledge Hubs. However, they also have distinct specializations: Linkwarden also focuses on Bookmark Managers.
Hosting & Deployment
Linkwarden provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Readeck may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.