Learn how Faved and Linkding differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these bookmark managers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Linkding appears to have several advantages over Faved, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Linkding significantly outpaces Faved in community adoption with 11,163 stars compared to 1,293 stars on GitHub. This 8.6x difference suggests Linkding has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Linkding has 612 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Faved is growing faster, adding 41 stars in the last 30 days (+3.3%) against adding 128 stars for Linkding (+1.2%). Faved is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Linkding shows more recent development activity with its last commit 13 hours ago, while Faved was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Linkding is being more actively maintained.
Faved uses PHP while Linkding leverages JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Python, Django.
Linkding has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Faved which began 1 year ago. This 6.0-year head start suggests Linkding may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Bookmark Managers.
Both Faved and Linkding offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.