Learn how Doop and Penpot differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ui/ux design tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
2 monthsVersion
v0.6.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
kgoedecke/doop
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
2.18.4License
MPL-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
penpot/penpot
Both Doop and Penpot have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Penpot significantly outpaces Doop in community adoption with 61,677 stars compared to 987 stars on GitHub. This 62.5x difference suggests Penpot has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Penpot has 4,284 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Doop is growing faster, adding 218 stars in the last 30 days (+28%) against adding 1,263 stars for Penpot (+2.1%). Doop is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Doop last updated 7 hours ago and Penpot 9 hours ago.
Penpot has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Doop which began 2 months ago. This 10.8-year head start suggests Penpot may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Doop is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Penpot uses MPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in UI/UX Design. However, they also have distinct specializations: Penpot extends into Online Design.
Both Doop and Penpot offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.