Learn how Doop and OpenPencil differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ui/ux design tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
2 monthsVersion
v0.6.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
kgoedecke/doop
Last 30 days
Last commit
17 hours agoRepository age
8 monthsVersion
v0.16.0License
MITRepository
open-pencil
Both Doop and OpenPencil have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenPencil significantly outpaces Doop in community adoption with 9,282 stars compared to 987 stars on GitHub. This 9.4x difference suggests OpenPencil has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenPencil has 964 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Doop is growing faster, adding 218 stars in the last 30 days (+28%) against adding 655 stars for OpenPencil (+7.6%). Doop is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Doop last updated 7 hours ago and OpenPencil 17 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Doop beginning 2 months ago and OpenPencil 8 months ago.
OpenPencil uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Doop's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in UI/UX Design.
Doop provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenPencil may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.