Learn how Doop and Quant-UX differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ui/ux design tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
2 monthsVersion
v0.6.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
kgoedecke/doop
Last 30 days

Both Doop and Quant-UX have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Quant-UX leads in popularity with 2,746 stars vs 987 stars for Doop. The 178% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Quant-UX has 293 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Doop is growing faster, adding 218 stars in the last 30 days (+28%) against adding 20 stars for Quant-UX (+0.7%). Doop is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Doop last updated 7 hours ago and Quant-UX 15 days ago.
Quant-UX has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Doop which began 2 months ago. This 7.4-year head start suggests Quant-UX may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Doop is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Quant-UX uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in UI/UX Design.
Doop provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Quant-UX may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.