Learn how DataLens and Deepnote differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these bi platforms is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Activity score

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Activity score

Both DataLens and Deepnote have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Deepnote leads in popularity with 2,933 stars vs 1,688 stars for DataLens. The 74% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Deepnote has 197 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with DataLens last updated 6 days ago and Deepnote 13 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: DataLens uses Bash while Deepnote leverages Typescript.
DataLens has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Deepnote which began 9 months ago. This 2.1-year head start suggests DataLens may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in BI Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: DataLens also focuses on Data Visualization while Deepnote extends into Data Platforms for AI.
DataLens provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Deepnote may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.