Learn how Appwrite and Temps differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these paas & deployment tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Appwrite appears to have several advantages over Temps, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Appwrite significantly outpaces Temps in community adoption with 56,029 stars compared to 435 stars on GitHub. This 128.8x difference suggests Appwrite has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Appwrite has 5,331 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Appwrite last updated 11 hours ago and Temps 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Appwrite uses PHP while Temps leverages CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js, Golang, Rust, Java, C#, NestJS.
Appwrite has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Temps which began 7 months ago. This 6.6-year head start suggests Appwrite may have more mature features and established processes.
Appwrite uses the BSD-3-Clause license, which is more permissive than Temps's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in PaaS & Deployment Tools. However, they also have distinct specializations: Appwrite also focuses on Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS) while Temps extends into Control Panels, Error Tracking.
Both Appwrite and Temps offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.