Learn how Aider and Continue differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding assistants is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Both Aider and Continue have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Aider having 44,090 stars and Continue having 32,875 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Continue has 4,433 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Aider last updated 4 days ago and Continue 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Python, Ruby. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Aider uses SCSS while Continue leverages Typescript, JSX, Golang, Rust, PHP, Java, Kotlin, C#, Django.
Both projects started around the same time, with Aider beginning 3 years ago and Continue 3 years ago.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Assistants. However, they also have distinct specializations: Continue extends into AI-Powered Editors.