Continue vs Kilo
Learn how Continue and Kilo differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agents is best for you.
Learn how Continue and Kilo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agents is best for you.
Continue
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v2.0.0License
Apache-2.0Repository
continuedev/continue
Kilo
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v7.4.23License
MITRepository
kilo-org/kilocode
Detailed Comparison
Both Continue and Kilo have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Continue and Kilo have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Continue having 35,560 stars and Kilo having 26,945 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Continue has 5,257 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Kilo is growing faster, adding 515 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 549 stars for Continue (+1.6%). Kilo is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Continue last updated 9 hours ago and Kilo 3 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Golang, PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Continue uses Rust, Java, Ruby, Kotlin, C#, Django while Kilo leverages Next.js.
Project Maturity
Continue has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Kilo which began 1 year ago. This 1.8-year head start suggests Continue may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Kilo uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Continue's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agents. However, they also have distinct specializations: Kilo extends into IDEs & Code Editors.
Docmost – Open-source wiki software with real-time collaboration, diagrams, AI, SSO, RBAC permissions and more.