What is the main difference between Cody and Kilo?

Cody and Kilo are both open source tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Cody or Kilo?

The choice between Cody and Kilo depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Cody to Kilo?

Migration between Cody and Kilo is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

InfluxDB – The purpose-built time series platform for high-velocity ingestion and real-time queries at scale.

Learn More

Cody vs Kilo

Learn how Cody and Kilo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.

Cody

Advanced AI coding assistant that helps enterprise teams write, fix, and maintain code with enhanced accuracy and consistency across large codebases

Visit Cody

Kilo

Open source AI coding agent with 500+ models, bring-your-own-key support, and specialized modes for writing, debugging, and planning code across IDEs and CLI.

Visit Kilo

Detailed Comparison

Kilo appears to have several advantages over Cody, particularly in popularity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Kilo wins

Community & Popularity

Kilo significantly outpaces Cody in community adoption with 26,853 stars compared to 87 stars on GitHub. This 308.7x difference suggests Kilo has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Kilo has 3,058 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Cody last updated 2 days ago and Kilo 6 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Golang, PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cody uses C, Rust, Java, C++, Kotlin while Kilo leverages Next.js.

Comparable

Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Cody beginning 2 years ago and Kilo 1 year ago.

Kilo wins

Licensing

Kilo uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Cody's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable