Learn how Continue and Tabby differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Activity score

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Activity score

Both Continue and Tabby have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Continue and Tabby show comparable community engagement with 34,825 and 33,689 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Continue has 5,020 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Continue last updated 7 hours ago and Tabby 11 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Rust, Java, Kotlin. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Continue uses Golang, PHP, Ruby, C#, Django while Tabby leverages Next.js, C++, Lua.
Both projects started around the same time, with Continue beginning 3 years ago and Tabby 3 years ago.
Continue is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Tabby's license terms are not publicly specified.
Continue also focuses on AI Code Reviewers while Tabby extends into AI Coding Assistants.
Tabby provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Continue may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.