Learn how Actual and Securo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these budgeting apps is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
16 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v26.10.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
actualbudget/actual
Last 30 days

Actual appears to have several advantages over Securo, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Actual significantly outpaces Securo in community adoption with 29,762 stars compared to 4,116 stars on GitHub. This 7.2x difference suggests Actual has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Actual has 3,204 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Securo is growing faster, adding 306 stars in the last 30 days (+8%) against adding 600 stars for Actual (+2.1%). Securo is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Actual last updated 16 hours ago and Securo 8 hours ago.
Actual has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Securo which began 8 months ago. This 3.9-year head start suggests Actual may have more mature features and established processes.
Actual uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Securo's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Budgeting Apps.
Both Actual and Securo offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.