Learn how ezBookkeeping and Securo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these budgeting apps is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
21 hours agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v2.1.1License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
ezbookkeeping
Last 30 days

Both ezBookkeeping and Securo have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with ezBookkeeping having 5,836 stars and Securo having 4,116 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, ezBookkeeping has 723 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Securo is growing faster, adding 306 stars in the last 30 days (+8%) against adding 174 stars for ezBookkeeping (+3.1%). Securo is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with ezBookkeeping last updated 21 hours ago and Securo 8 hours ago.
ezBookkeeping has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Securo which began 8 months ago. This 5.5-year head start suggests ezBookkeeping may have more mature features and established processes.
ezBookkeeping uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Securo's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Budgeting Apps. However, they also have distinct specializations: ezBookkeeping also focuses on Accounting Software.
Both ezBookkeeping and Securo offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs