Learn how Monetr and Securo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these budgeting apps is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v1.21.0License
FSL-1.1-MITRepository
monetr/monetr
Last 30 days

Securo appears to have several advantages over Monetr, particularly in popularity, growth and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Securo significantly outpaces Monetr in community adoption with 4,116 stars compared to 690 stars on GitHub. This 6.0x difference suggests Securo has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Securo has 575 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Securo is growing faster, adding 306 stars in the last 30 days (+8%) against adding 7 stars for Monetr (+1%). Securo is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Monetr last updated 8 hours ago and Securo 8 hours ago.
Monetr has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Securo which began 8 months ago. This 4.6-year head start suggests Monetr may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Monetr is licensed under FSL-1.1-MIT while Securo uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Budgeting Apps.
Securo provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Monetr may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.