Learn how Firefly III and Securo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these budgeting apps is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 hours agoRepository age
12 yearsVersion
v6.7.9License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
firefly-iii
Last 30 days

Both Firefly III and Securo have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Firefly III significantly outpaces Securo in community adoption with 24,998 stars compared to 4,116 stars on GitHub. This 6.1x difference suggests Firefly III has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Firefly III has 2,352 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Securo is growing faster, adding 306 stars in the last 30 days (+8%) against adding 259 stars for Firefly III (+1%). Securo is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Firefly III last updated 11 hours ago and Securo 8 hours ago.
Firefly III has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Securo which began 8 months ago. This 11.9-year head start suggests Firefly III may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Budgeting Apps.
Both Firefly III and Securo offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.