Learn how Tolgee and Weblate differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these translation management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Tolgee and Weblate have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Tolgee having 4,091 stars and Weblate having 6,054 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Weblate has 1,349 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Tolgee and Weblate are moving at much the same rate, adding 32 stars and adding 44 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.8% vs +0.7%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Tolgee last updated 1 hour ago and Weblate 2 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Tolgee uses Typescript, JSX, Java, Kotlin while Weblate leverages CSS, Python, Lua.
Weblate has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Tolgee which began 6 years ago. This 8.8-year head start suggests Weblate may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Tolgee is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Weblate uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Translation Management.
Both Tolgee and Weblate offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.