Learn how Tolgee and Weblate differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these translation management tools is best for you.

Both Tolgee and Weblate have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Tolgee having 4,068 stars and Weblate having 6,025 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Weblate has 1,335 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Tolgee and Weblate are moving at much the same rate, adding 34 stars and adding 43 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.8% vs +0.7%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Tolgee last updated 14 hours ago and Weblate 3 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Tolgee uses Typescript, JSX, Java, Kotlin while Weblate leverages CSS, Python, Lua.
Weblate has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Tolgee which began 6 years ago. This 8.8-year head start suggests Weblate may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Tolgee is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Weblate uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Translation Management.
Tolgee provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Weblate may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository