Learn how Tolgee and Weblate differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these translation management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
13 hours agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v3.242.1License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
tolgee-platform
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 hours agoRepository age
15 yearsVersion
2026.11License
GPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
weblateorg/weblate
Both Tolgee and Weblate have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Tolgee having 4,155 stars and Weblate having 6,159 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Weblate has 1,380 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Tolgee and Weblate are moving at much the same rate, adding 31 stars and adding 52 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.8% vs +0.9%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Tolgee last updated 13 hours ago and Weblate 4 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Tolgee uses Typescript, JSX, Java, Kotlin while Weblate leverages CSS, Python, Lua.
Weblate has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Tolgee which began 6 years ago. This 8.8-year head start suggests Weblate may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Tolgee is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Weblate uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Translation Management.
Both Tolgee and Weblate offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.