What is the main difference between Lingo.dev and Weblate?

Lingo.dev and Weblate are both translation management tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Lingo.dev or Weblate?

The choice between Lingo.dev and Weblate depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Lingo.dev to Weblate?

Migration between Lingo.dev and Weblate is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.

Learn More

Lingo.dev vs Weblate

Learn how Lingo.dev and Weblate differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these translation management tools is best for you.

Lingo.dev

Transform your app into a global product with AI-powered localization that integrates directly into your development workflow. Supports 83+ languages with Git-native automation.

Visit Lingo.dev Read more

5,405stars+8(+0.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
10 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
0.138.5
License
Apache-2.0
Repository
lingodotdev/lingo.dev

Weblate

Web-based continuous localization platform with version control integration, quality checks, and clean interface. Used by 2,500+ projects in 165+ countries.

Visit Weblate Read more

6,028stars+40(+0.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
8 hours ago
Repository age
14 years
Version
2026.8.1
License
GPL-3.0
Repository
weblateorg/weblate

Sponsor Weblate ongithub.com

Detailed Comparison

Weblate appears to have several advantages over Lingo.dev, particularly in growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Comparable

Community & Popularity

Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Lingo.dev having 5,405 stars and Weblate having 6,028 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Weblate has 1,336 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Weblate wins

Growth Momentum

Weblate is growing faster, adding 40 stars in the last 30 days (+0.7%) against adding 8 stars for Lingo.dev (+0.1%). Weblate is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Lingo.dev last updated 10 hours ago and Weblate 8 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Lingo.dev uses Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Vue, PHP while Weblate leverages Bash, Python, Lua.

Weblate wins

Project Maturity

Weblate has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Lingo.dev which began 2 years ago. This 12.2-year head start suggests Weblate may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Lingo.dev is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Weblate uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Translation Management.

Other tool comparisons to consider