Learn how Lingo.dev and Tolgee differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these translation management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Tolgee appears to have several advantages over Lingo.dev, particularly in growth, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Lingo.dev having 5,401 stars and Tolgee having 4,091 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Lingo.dev has 811 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Tolgee is growing faster, adding 32 stars in the last 30 days (+0.8%) against adding 0 stars for Lingo.dev (0%). Tolgee is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Lingo.dev last updated 20 hours ago and Tolgee 1 hour ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Lingo.dev uses CSS, Next.js, Vue, PHP while Tolgee leverages Bash, Java, Kotlin.
Tolgee has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Lingo.dev which began 2 years ago. This 3.5-year head start suggests Tolgee may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Translation Management.
Tolgee provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Lingo.dev may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.