Lingo.dev vs Tolgee
Learn how Lingo.dev and Tolgee differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these translation management tools is best for you.
Learn how Lingo.dev and Tolgee differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these translation management tools is best for you.
Lingo.dev
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
0.12.16License
Apache-2.0Repository
lingo.dev
Tolgee
Last 30 days
Last commit
13 hours agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v3.242.1License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
tolgee-platform
Detailed Comparison
Tolgee appears to have several advantages over Lingo.dev, particularly in growth, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Tolgee appears to have several advantages over Lingo.dev, particularly in growth, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Lingo.dev having 5,404 stars and Tolgee having 4,155 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Lingo.dev has 811 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Tolgee is growing faster, adding 31 stars in the last 30 days (+0.8%) against losing 1 stars for Lingo.dev (0%). Tolgee is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Lingo.dev last updated 2 days ago and Tolgee 13 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Lingo.dev uses CSS, Next.js, PHP, Vue while Tolgee leverages Bash, Java, Kotlin.
Project Maturity
Tolgee has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Lingo.dev which began 3 years ago. This 3.5-year head start suggests Tolgee may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Translation Management.
Hosting & Deployment
Tolgee provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Lingo.dev may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
InfluxDB – The purpose-built time series platform for high-velocity ingestion and real-time queries at scale.