What is the main difference between Structr and ToolJet?

Structr and ToolJet are both low-code/no-code platforms but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Structr or ToolJet?

The choice between Structr and ToolJet depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Structr to ToolJet?

Migration between Structr and ToolJet is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sent – Messaging Infrastructure for Developers. One API for SMS, WhatsApp, and RCS across 190+ countries.

Learn More

Structr vs ToolJet

Learn how Structr and ToolJet differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.

Structr

Open-source low-code platform combining Neo4j graph database, visual schema editor, automatic REST APIs, and page rendering in one self-hosted environment.

Visit Structr Read more

828stars-1(-0.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
4 days ago
Repository age
16 years
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
structr/structr

ToolJet

Open-source low-code platform for creating custom internal tools, dashboards, and admin panels with a drag-and-drop interface

Visit ToolJet Read more

41,092stars+166(+0.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
6 hours ago
Repository age
6 years
Version
v3.20.246-lts
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
tooljet/tooljet

Detailed Comparison

ToolJet appears to have several advantages over Structr, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

ToolJet wins

Community & Popularity

ToolJet significantly outpaces Structr in community adoption with 41,092 stars compared to 828 stars on GitHub. This 49.6x difference suggests ToolJet has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, ToolJet has 5,500 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

ToolJet wins

Growth Momentum

ToolJet is growing faster, adding 166 stars in the last 30 days (+0.4%) against losing 1 stars for Structr (-0.1%). ToolJet is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Structr last updated 4 days ago and ToolJet 6 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Structr uses Java while ToolJet leverages JSX, SCSS, Perl, NestJS.

Structr wins

Project Maturity

Structr has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to ToolJet which began 6 years ago. This 10.3-year head start suggests Structr may have more mature features and established processes.

ToolJet wins