Ad
 
Learn More

Phase vs HashiCorp Vault

Learn how Phase and HashiCorp Vault differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these secrets platforms is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Phase

Phase

Open source platform for engineering teams to manage secrets and environment variables from development to production, with powerful integrations.
911stars+10(+1.1%)

Last 30 days

  • Last commit


    15 hours ago
  • Repository age


    3 years
  • Version


    v2.74.0
  • License


    MIT
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
  • Repository


    phasehq/console
Screenshot of Phase
Favicon of HashiCorp Vault

HashiCorp Vault

Manages tokens, passwords, certificates, and encryption keys through a UI, CLI, or HTTP API, with dynamic credentials and encryption-as-a-service built in.
36,194stars+151(+0.4%)

Last 30 days

  • Last commit


    12 hours ago
  • Repository age


    12 years
  • Version


    v2.1.0
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
  • Repository


    hashicorp/vault
Screenshot of HashiCorp Vault

Detailed Comparison

Both Phase and HashiCorp Vault have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

HashiCorp Vault wins
Community & Popularity

HashiCorp Vault significantly outpaces Phase in community adoption with 36,194 stars compared to 911 stars on GitHub. This 39.7x difference suggests HashiCorp Vault has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, HashiCorp Vault has 4,746 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Phase wins
Growth Momentum

Phase is growing faster, adding 10 stars in the last 30 days (+1.1%) against adding 151 stars for HashiCorp Vault (+0.4%). Phase is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Phase last updated 15 hours ago and HashiCorp Vault 12 hours ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Phase uses CSS, JSX, Python while HashiCorp Vault leverages SCSS, Golang.

HashiCorp Vault wins
Project Maturity

HashiCorp Vault has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Phase which began 3 years ago. This 8.4-year head start suggests HashiCorp Vault may have more mature features and established processes.

Phase wins
Licensing

Phase is licensed under MIT, while HashiCorp Vault's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Secrets Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: HashiCorp Vault extends into Identity & Access Management (IAM).

Comparable
Hosting & Deployment

Both Phase and HashiCorp Vault offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.