Learn how Infisical and HashiCorp Vault differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these secrets platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v0.167.6License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
infisical/infisical
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
12 yearsVersion
v2.2.1Self-hosted
YesRepository
hashicorp/vault
Both Infisical and HashiCorp Vault have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Infisical having 30,347 stars and HashiCorp Vault having 36,481 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, HashiCorp Vault has 4,809 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Infisical is growing faster, adding 668 stars in the last 30 days (+2.3%) against adding 113 stars for HashiCorp Vault (+0.3%). Infisical is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Infisical last updated 9 hours ago and HashiCorp Vault 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Infisical uses CSS, JSX, Python while HashiCorp Vault leverages Next.js, SCSS.
HashiCorp Vault has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Infisical which began 4 years ago. This 7.6-year head start suggests HashiCorp Vault may have more mature features and established processes.
Infisical is licensed under MIT, while HashiCorp Vault's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Secrets Platforms.
Both Infisical and HashiCorp Vault offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.