Learn how Infisical and HashiCorp Vault differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these secrets platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Infisical and HashiCorp Vault have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Infisical having 29,497 stars and HashiCorp Vault having 36,317 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, HashiCorp Vault has 4,770 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Infisical is growing faster, adding 466 stars in the last 30 days (+1.6%) against adding 129 stars for HashiCorp Vault (+0.4%). Infisical is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Infisical last updated 3 hours ago and HashiCorp Vault 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Infisical uses CSS, JSX, Python while HashiCorp Vault leverages Next.js, SCSS.
HashiCorp Vault has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Infisical which began 4 years ago. This 7.6-year head start suggests HashiCorp Vault may have more mature features and established processes.
Infisical is licensed under MIT, while HashiCorp Vault's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Secrets Platforms.
Both Infisical and HashiCorp Vault offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.