Learn how Keyshade and HashiCorp Vault differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these secrets platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
12 yearsVersion
v2.2.1Self-hosted
YesRepository
hashicorp/vault
HashiCorp Vault appears to have several advantages over Keyshade, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
HashiCorp Vault significantly outpaces Keyshade in community adoption with 36,481 stars compared to 769 stars on GitHub. This 47.4x difference suggests HashiCorp Vault has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, HashiCorp Vault has 4,809 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
HashiCorp Vault is growing faster, adding 113 stars in the last 30 days (+0.3%) against losing 1 stars for Keyshade (-0.1%). HashiCorp Vault is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Keyshade last updated 8 days ago and HashiCorp Vault 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Keyshade uses CSS, JSX, NestJS while HashiCorp Vault leverages Bash, Golang, SCSS.
HashiCorp Vault has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Keyshade which began 3 years ago. This 9.0-year head start suggests HashiCorp Vault may have more mature features and established processes.
Keyshade is licensed under MIT, while HashiCorp Vault's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Secrets Platforms.
HashiCorp Vault provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Keyshade may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.