Learn how Keyshade and Phase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these secrets platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v2.79.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
phasehq/console
Phase appears to have several advantages over Keyshade, particularly in growth and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Keyshade having 769 stars and Phase having 946 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Keyshade has 263 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Phase is growing faster, adding 17 stars in the last 30 days (+1.8%) against losing 1 stars for Keyshade (-0.1%). Phase is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Keyshade last updated 8 days ago and Phase 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Keyshade uses NestJS while Phase leverages Bash, Python.
Both projects started around the same time, with Keyshade beginning 3 years ago and Phase 3 years ago.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Secrets Platforms.
Phase provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Keyshade may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.