Learn how Infisical and Phase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these secrets platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v0.167.6License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
infisical/infisical
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v2.79.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
phasehq/console
Infisical appears to have several advantages over Phase, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Infisical significantly outpaces Phase in community adoption with 30,347 stars compared to 946 stars on GitHub. This 32.1x difference suggests Infisical has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Infisical has 2,416 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Infisical is growing faster, adding 668 stars in the last 30 days (+2.3%) against adding 17 stars for Phase (+1.8%). Infisical is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Infisical last updated 9 hours ago and Phase 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Infisical uses Golang while Phase leverages Next.js.
Both projects started around the same time, with Infisical beginning 4 years ago and Phase 3 years ago.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Secrets Platforms.
Both Infisical and Phase offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.