Learn how OpenHands and Tabby differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

OpenHands appears to have several advantages over Tabby, particularly in popularity, growth, activity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenHands leads in popularity with 84,962 stars vs 33,833 stars for Tabby. The 151% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenHands has 11,090 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenHands is growing faster, adding 2,902 stars in the last 30 days (+3.5%) against adding 42 stars for Tabby (+0.1%). OpenHands is both larger and pulling further ahead.
OpenHands shows more recent development activity with its last commit 2 hours ago, while Tabby was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests OpenHands is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Tabby leverages Next.js, Rust, Java, C++, Kotlin, Lua.
Tabby has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to OpenHands which began 2 years ago. This 1.0-year head start suggests Tabby may have more mature features and established processes.
OpenHands uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Tabby's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
OpenHands also focuses on AI Coding Agents while Tabby extends into AI Coding Assistants.
Both OpenHands and Tabby offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.