Learn how Onlook and WebStudio differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these frontend development tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

WebStudio appears to have several advantages over Onlook, particularly in growth, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Onlook leads in popularity with 26,829 stars vs 8,999 stars for WebStudio. The 198% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Onlook has 2,111 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
WebStudio is growing faster, adding 119 stars in the last 30 days (+1.3%) against adding 230 stars for Onlook (+0.9%). WebStudio is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
WebStudio shows more recent development activity with its last commit 13 hours ago, while Onlook was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests WebStudio is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Onlook uses Next.js while WebStudio leverages Bash, Remix.
WebStudio has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Onlook which began 2 years ago. This 2.3-year head start suggests WebStudio may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Onlook is licensed under Apache-2.0 while WebStudio uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Frontend Development. However, they also have distinct specializations: WebStudio extends into Low-Code/No-Code, Website Builders.