Learn how OceanBase and TiDB differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these relational databases (sql) is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v4.6.0License
Apache-2.0Repository
oceanbase/oceanbase
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
v7.5.8License
Apache-2.0Repository
pingcap/tidb
Both OceanBase and TiDB have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
TiDB significantly outpaces OceanBase in community adoption with 40,718 stars compared to 10,369 stars on GitHub. This 3.9x difference suggests TiDB has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, TiDB has 6,292 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OceanBase is growing faster, adding 71 stars in the last 30 days (+0.7%) against adding 88 stars for TiDB (+0.2%). OceanBase is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with OceanBase last updated 2 days ago and TiDB 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OceanBase uses Python, C, Objective-C, C++, Perl, Lua while TiDB leverages JavaScript, Typescript, JSX, Golang.
TiDB has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to OceanBase which began 5 years ago. This 5.8-year head start suggests TiDB may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Relational Databases (SQL).