What is the main difference between Neon Postgres and TiDB?

Neon Postgres and TiDB are both relational databases (sql) but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Neon Postgres or TiDB?

The choice between Neon Postgres and TiDB depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Neon Postgres to TiDB?

Migration between Neon Postgres and TiDB is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

c15t – Open-source cookie banner, built for control and lightening fast modern web apps.

Learn More

Neon Postgres vs TiDB

Learn how Neon Postgres and TiDB differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these relational databases (sql) is best for you.

Neon Postgres

Cloud-native, auto-scaling Postgres with instant branching, bottomless storage, and pay-per-use pricing

Visit Neon Postgres Read more

23,219stars+106(+0.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 months ago
Repository age
6 years
License
Apache-2.0
Repository
neondatabase/neon

TiDB

Distributed SQL database combining OLTP and OLAP capabilities, offering horizontal scalability, high availability, and real-time analytics.

Visit TiDB Read more

40,653stars+101(+0.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
7 hours ago
Repository age
11 years
Version
v7.5.8
License
Apache-2.0
Repository
pingcap/tidb

Detailed Comparison

TiDB appears to have several advantages over Neon Postgres, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

TiDB wins

Community & Popularity

TiDB leads in popularity with 40,653 stars vs 23,219 stars for Neon Postgres. The 75% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, TiDB has 6,267 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Growth Momentum

Neon Postgres and TiDB are moving at much the same rate, adding 106 stars and adding 101 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.5% vs +0.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.

TiDB wins

Development Activity

TiDB shows more recent development activity with its last commit 7 hours ago, while Neon Postgres was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests TiDB is being more actively maintained.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Neon Postgres uses Python, Rust, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, C# while TiDB leverages Typescript, JSX, Golang.

TiDB wins

Project Maturity

TiDB has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Neon Postgres which began 6 years ago. This 5.6-year head start suggests TiDB may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable