Learn how Neon Postgres and TiDB differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these relational databases (sql) is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Neon Postgres and TiDB have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
TiDB leads in popularity with 40,502 stars vs 23,057 stars for Neon Postgres. The 76% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, TiDB has 6,239 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Neon Postgres is growing faster, adding 243 stars in the last 30 days (+1.1%) against adding 91 stars for TiDB (+0.2%). Neon Postgres is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Neon Postgres last updated 9 days ago and TiDB 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Neon Postgres uses Python, Rust, C, Objective-C, Java, Swift, C# while TiDB leverages Typescript, JSX, Golang.
TiDB has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Neon Postgres which began 5 years ago. This 5.6-year head start suggests TiDB may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Relational Databases (SQL).