Learn how Neon Postgres and OceanBase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these relational databases (sql) is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .


Both Neon Postgres and OceanBase have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Neon Postgres leads in popularity with 21,638 stars vs 10,080 stars for OceanBase. The 115% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OceanBase has 1,887 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OceanBase shows more recent development activity with its last commit 15 hours ago, while Neon Postgres was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests OceanBase is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python, C, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Neon Postgres uses JavaScript, Rust, Java, Swift, C# while OceanBase leverages C++, Perl, Lua.
Both projects started around the same time, with Neon Postgres beginning 5 years ago and OceanBase 5 years ago.
Neon Postgres is licensed under Apache-2.0, while OceanBase's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Relational Databases (SQL).