Learn how Neon Postgres and OceanBase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these relational databases (sql) is best for you.

Both Neon Postgres and OceanBase have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Neon Postgres leads in popularity with 22,847 stars vs 10,239 stars for OceanBase. The 123% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OceanBase has 1,904 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Neon Postgres is growing faster, adding 301 stars in the last 30 days (+1.3%) against adding 48 stars for OceanBase (+0.5%). Neon Postgres is both larger and pulling further ahead.
OceanBase shows more recent development activity with its last commit 23 hours ago, while Neon Postgres was last updated 3 months ago. This suggests OceanBase is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python, C, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Neon Postgres uses JavaScript, Rust, Java, Swift, C# while OceanBase leverages C++, Perl, Lua.
Both projects started around the same time, with Neon Postgres beginning 5 years ago and OceanBase 5 years ago.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Relational Databases (SQL).

vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository