Learn how Neon Postgres and OceanBase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these relational databases (sql) is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 months agoRepository age
6 yearsLicense
Apache-2.0Repository
neondatabase/neon
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v4.6.0License
Apache-2.0Repository
oceanbase/oceanbase
Both Neon Postgres and OceanBase have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Neon Postgres leads in popularity with 23,309 stars vs 10,369 stars for OceanBase. The 125% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OceanBase has 1,930 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Neon Postgres and OceanBase are moving at much the same rate, adding 127 stars and adding 71 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.5% vs +0.7%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
OceanBase shows more recent development activity with its last commit 2 days ago, while Neon Postgres was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests OceanBase is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python, C, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Neon Postgres uses JavaScript, Rust, Java, Swift, C# while OceanBase leverages C++, Perl, Lua.
Both projects started around the same time, with Neon Postgres beginning 6 years ago and OceanBase 5 years ago.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Relational Databases (SQL).