Learn how Neon Postgres and OceanBase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these relational databases (sql) is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Neon Postgres appears to have several advantages over OceanBase, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Neon Postgres leads in popularity with 23,148 stars vs 10,294 stars for OceanBase. The 125% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OceanBase has 1,920 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Neon Postgres is growing faster, adding 148 stars in the last 30 days (+0.6%) against adding 36 stars for OceanBase (+0.4%). Neon Postgres is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Neon Postgres last updated 29 days ago and OceanBase 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python, C, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Neon Postgres uses JavaScript, Rust, Java, Swift, C# while OceanBase leverages C++, Perl, Lua.
Both projects started around the same time, with Neon Postgres beginning 6 years ago and OceanBase 5 years ago.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Relational Databases (SQL).