Learn how Neon Postgres and OceanBase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these relational databases (sql) is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Neon Postgres and OceanBase have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Neon Postgres leads in popularity with 23,219 stars vs 10,340 stars for OceanBase. The 125% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OceanBase has 1,928 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Neon Postgres and OceanBase are moving at much the same rate, adding 106 stars and adding 57 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.5% vs +0.6%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
OceanBase shows more recent development activity with its last commit 10 days ago, while Neon Postgres was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests OceanBase is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python, C, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Neon Postgres uses JavaScript, Rust, Java, Swift, C# while OceanBase leverages C++, Perl, Lua.
Both projects started around the same time, with Neon Postgres beginning 6 years ago and OceanBase 5 years ago.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Relational Databases (SQL).