Learn how Neon Postgres and OceanBase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these relational databases (sql) is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Activity score

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Activity score

Neon Postgres appears to have several advantages over OceanBase, particularly in popularity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Neon Postgres leads in popularity with 22,273 stars vs 10,160 stars for OceanBase. The 119% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OceanBase has 1,902 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Neon Postgres last updated 25 days ago and OceanBase 24 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python, C, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Neon Postgres uses JavaScript, Rust, Java, Swift, C# while OceanBase leverages C++, Perl, Lua.
Both projects started around the same time, with Neon Postgres beginning 5 years ago and OceanBase 5 years ago.
Neon Postgres is licensed under Apache-2.0, while OceanBase's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Relational Databases (SQL).