Learn how Milvus and Qdrant differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vector databases is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Milvus and Qdrant have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Milvus having 46,026 stars and Qdrant having 34,449 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Milvus has 4,238 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Qdrant is growing faster, adding 562 stars in the last 30 days (+1.7%) against adding 455 stars for Milvus (+1%). Qdrant is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Milvus last updated 18 hours ago and Qdrant 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Python, Rust, C, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Milvus uses CSS, Golang, C++.
Both projects started around the same time, with Milvus beginning 7 years ago and Qdrant 6 years ago.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Vector Databases.
Both Milvus and Qdrant offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.