What is the main difference between Milvus and Qdrant?

Milvus and Qdrant are both vector databases but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Milvus or Qdrant?

The choice between Milvus and Qdrant depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Milvus to Qdrant?

Migration between Milvus and Qdrant is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

InfluxDB – The purpose-built time series platform for high-velocity ingestion and real-time queries at scale.

Learn More

Milvus vs Qdrant

Learn how Milvus and Qdrant differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vector databases is best for you.

Milvus

Open-source vector database optimized for similarity search, scaling to billions of vectors with minimal performance loss

Visit Milvus Read more

45,698stars+415(+0.9%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
10 hours ago
Repository age
7 years
Version
v3.0.0
License
Apache-2.0
Repository
milvus-io/milvus

Qdrant

Qdrant is an open-source vector database that provides high-performance similarity search for AI and machine learning applications.

Visit Qdrant Read more

34,062stars+629(+1.9%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
10 hours ago
Repository age
6 years
Version
v1.19.0
License
Apache-2.0
Repository
qdrant/qdrant

Detailed Comparison

Both Milvus and Qdrant have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Comparable

Community & Popularity

Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Milvus having 45,698 stars and Qdrant having 34,062 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Milvus has 4,185 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Qdrant wins

Growth Momentum

Qdrant is growing faster, adding 629 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 415 stars for Milvus (+0.9%). Qdrant is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Milvus last updated 10 hours ago and Qdrant 10 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Python, C, Rust, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Milvus uses CSS, Golang, C++.

Comparable