What is the main difference between Qdrant and Weaviate?

Qdrant and Weaviate are both vector databases but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Qdrant or Weaviate?

The choice between Qdrant and Weaviate depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Qdrant to Weaviate?

Migration between Qdrant and Weaviate is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Postiz – The All-in-One agentic social media scheduling tool

Learn more

Qdrant vs Weaviate

Learn how Qdrant and Weaviate differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vector databases is best for you.

Qdrant

Qdrant is an open-source vector database that provides high-performance similarity search for AI and machine learning applications.

Visit Qdrant Read more

35,389stars+471(+1.3%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
9 hours ago
Repository age
6 years
Version
v1.20.0
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
qdrant/qdrant

Weaviate

Open-source vector database designed for building powerful, production-ready AI applications with hybrid search capabilities and flexible deployment options.

Visit Weaviate Read more

16,934stars+72(+0.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
9 hours ago
Repository age
11 years
Version
v1.40.3
License
BSD-3-Clause
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
weaviate/weaviate

Detailed Comparison

Both Qdrant and Weaviate have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Qdrant wins

Community & Popularity

Qdrant leads in popularity with 35,389 stars vs 16,934 stars for Weaviate. The 109% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Qdrant has 2,793 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Qdrant wins

Growth Momentum

Qdrant is growing faster, adding 471 stars in the last 30 days (+1.3%) against adding 72 stars for Weaviate (+0.4%). Qdrant is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Qdrant last updated 9 hours ago and Weaviate 9 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Python, C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Qdrant uses Rust, Objective-C while Weaviate leverages Golang.

Weaviate wins

Project Maturity

Weaviate has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Qdrant which began 6 years ago. This 4.2-year head start suggests Weaviate may have more mature features and established processes.

Weaviate wins

Licensing

Weaviate uses the BSD-3-Clause license, which is more permissive than Qdrant's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable