Learn how Milvus and Weaviate differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vector databases is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Milvus and Weaviate have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Milvus leads in popularity with 46,376 stars vs 16,879 stars for Weaviate. The 175% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Milvus has 4,294 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Milvus and Weaviate are moving at much the same rate, adding 285 stars and adding 74 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.6% vs +0.4%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Milvus last updated 12 hours ago and Weaviate 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Python, Golang, C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Milvus uses CSS, Rust, Objective-C, C++.
Weaviate has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Milvus which began 7 years ago. This 3.5-year head start suggests Weaviate may have more mature features and established processes.
Weaviate uses the BSD-3-Clause license, which is more permissive than Milvus's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Vector Databases.
Both Milvus and Weaviate offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.