Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.Learn how HelixDB and Milvus differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these vector databases is best for you.
Milvus appears to have several advantages over HelixDB, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Milvus significantly outpaces HelixDB in community adoption with 45,441 stars compared to 5,690 stars on GitHub. This 8.0x difference suggests Milvus has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Milvus has 4,149 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with HelixDB last updated 14 days ago and Milvus 6 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Rust. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Milvus leverages JavaScript, CSS, Python, Golang, C, Objective-C, C++.
Milvus has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to HelixDB which began 2 years ago. This 5.3-year head start suggests Milvus may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Vector Databases. However, they also have distinct specializations: HelixDB also focuses on Databases.
HelixDBvs
WeaviateActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
