Learn how Harper and LanguageTool differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these browser extensions is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Harper and LanguageTool have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Harper and LanguageTool show comparable community engagement with 15,207 and 14,997 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, LanguageTool has 1,577 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Harper is growing faster, adding 877 stars in the last 30 days (+6.1%) against adding 214 stars for LanguageTool (+1.4%). Harper is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Harper last updated 10 hours ago and LanguageTool 18 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Harper uses JavaScript, Typescript, JSX, Rust, PHP, SvelteKit while LanguageTool leverages Python, Java, Perl.
LanguageTool has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Harper which began 3 years ago. This 10.4-year head start suggests LanguageTool may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Harper is licensed under Apache-2.0 while LanguageTool uses LGPL-2.1. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Browser Extensions, Productivity & Utilities.
LanguageTool provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Harper may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.