Learn how Harper and LanguageTool differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these browser extensions is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
12 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v3.1.0License
Apache-2.0Repository
automattic/harper
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
13 yearsLicense
LGPL-2.1Self-hosted
YesRepository
languagetool
Both Harper and LanguageTool have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Harper having 17,503 stars and LanguageTool having 15,241 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, LanguageTool has 1,601 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Harper is growing faster, adding 1,235 stars in the last 30 days (+7.6%) against adding 122 stars for LanguageTool (+0.8%). Harper is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Harper last updated 12 hours ago and LanguageTool 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Harper uses JavaScript, Typescript, JSX, Rust, PHP, SvelteKit while LanguageTool leverages Python, Java, Perl.
LanguageTool has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Harper which began 3 years ago. This 10.4-year head start suggests LanguageTool may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Harper is licensed under Apache-2.0 while LanguageTool uses LGPL-2.1. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Browser Extensions.
LanguageTool provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Harper may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.