Learn how Giselle and ToolJet differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

ToolJet appears to have several advantages over Giselle, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
ToolJet significantly outpaces Giselle in community adoption with 41,093 stars compared to 557 stars on GitHub. This 73.8x difference suggests ToolJet has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, ToolJet has 5,498 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Giselle and ToolJet are moving at much the same rate, adding 3 stars and adding 180 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.5% vs +0.4%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Giselle last updated 14 days ago and ToolJet 3 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Giselle uses Next.js while ToolJet leverages SCSS, Perl, NestJS.
ToolJet has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Giselle which began 2 years ago. This 3.4-year head start suggests ToolJet may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Giselle is licensed under Apache-2.0 while ToolJet uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: Giselle also focuses on AI Agent Platforms.
ToolJet provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Giselle may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.