Learn how Fider and Reflet differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these feedback & feature request management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
19 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
v0.39.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
getfider/fider

Fider appears to have several advantages over Reflet, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Fider significantly outpaces Reflet in community adoption with 4,601 stars compared to 39 stars on GitHub. This 118.0x difference suggests Fider has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Fider has 876 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Fider last updated 19 hours ago and Reflet 4 days ago.
Fider uses Golang while Reflet leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js.
Fider has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Reflet which began 10 months ago. This 9.1-year head start suggests Fider may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Fider is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Reflet uses SSPL-1.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Feedback & Feature Request Management.
Fider provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Reflet may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.