Learn how Fider and LogChimp differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these community feedback platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Fider appears to have several advantages over LogChimp, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Fider significantly outpaces LogChimp in community adoption with 4,495 stars compared to 1,123 stars on GitHub. This 4.0x difference suggests Fider has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Fider has 848 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Fider and LogChimp are moving at much the same rate, adding 40 stars and adding 9 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.9% vs +0.8%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Fider last updated 4 days ago and LogChimp 1 day ago.
Fider uses Golang while LogChimp leverages JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Vue.
Fider has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to LogChimp which began 7 years ago. This 3.0-year head start suggests Fider may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Fider is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while LogChimp uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Community Feedback Platforms, Feedback & Feature Request Management.
Both Fider and LogChimp offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.