Learn how Fider and LogChimp differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these feedback & feature request management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
19 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
v0.39.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
getfider/fider
Last 30 days
Last commit
18 hours agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v0.9.4License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
logchimp/logchimp
Fider appears to have several advantages over LogChimp, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Fider significantly outpaces LogChimp in community adoption with 4,601 stars compared to 1,135 stars on GitHub. This 4.1x difference suggests Fider has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Fider has 876 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Fider is growing faster, adding 39 stars in the last 30 days (+0.9%) against adding 2 stars for LogChimp (+0.2%). Fider is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Fider last updated 19 hours ago and LogChimp 18 hours ago.
Fider uses Golang while LogChimp leverages JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Vue.
Fider has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to LogChimp which began 7 years ago. This 3.0-year head start suggests Fider may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Fider is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while LogChimp uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Feedback & Feature Request Management.
Both Fider and LogChimp offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.