Learn how Fider and LogChimp differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these feedback & feature request management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Fider appears to have several advantages over LogChimp, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Fider significantly outpaces LogChimp in community adoption with 4,585 stars compared to 1,132 stars on GitHub. This 4.1x difference suggests Fider has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Fider has 869 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Fider is growing faster, adding 56 stars in the last 30 days (+1.2%) against adding 4 stars for LogChimp (+0.4%). Fider is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Fider last updated 18 hours ago and LogChimp 8 hours ago.
Fider uses Golang while LogChimp leverages JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Vue.
Fider has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to LogChimp which began 7 years ago. This 3.0-year head start suggests Fider may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Fider is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while LogChimp uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Feedback & Feature Request Management.
Both Fider and LogChimp offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.