What is the main difference between Fider and Quackback?

Fider and Quackback are both feedback & feature request management tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Fider or Quackback?

The choice between Fider and Quackback depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Fider to Quackback?

Migration between Fider and Quackback is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn more

Fider vs Quackback

Learn how Fider and Quackback differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these feedback & feature request management tools is best for you.

Fider

A self-hosted community feedback tool that helps organizations gather, discuss, and prioritize user suggestions and feature requests.

Visit Fider Read more

4,589stars+45(+1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
5 days ago
Repository age
10 years
Version
v0.38.2
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
getfider/fider

Quackback

Collect, prioritize and act on user feedback. Public boards, roadmaps and changelogs show users what you're planning and what has shipped.

Visit Quackback Read more

330stars+37(+13%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
4 days ago
Repository age
11 months
Version
v0.14.1
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
quackback

Detailed Comparison

Both Fider and Quackback have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Fider wins

Community & Popularity

Fider significantly outpaces Quackback in community adoption with 4,589 stars compared to 330 stars on GitHub. This 13.9x difference suggests Fider has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Fider has 871 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Quackback wins

Growth Momentum

Quackback is growing faster, adding 37 stars in the last 30 days (+13%) against adding 45 stars for Fider (+1%). Quackback is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Fider last updated 5 days ago and Quackback 4 days ago.

Fider wins

Project Maturity

Fider has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Quackback which began 11 months ago. This 9.0-year head start suggests Fider may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable