Fider vs Quackback
Learn how Fider and Quackback differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these feedback & feature request management tools is best for you.
Learn how Fider and Quackback differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these feedback & feature request management tools is best for you.
Fider
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
v0.39.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
getfider/fider
Quackback
Last 30 days
Detailed Comparison
Both Fider and Quackback have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Fider and Quackback have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Fider significantly outpaces Quackback in community adoption with 4,627 stars compared to 362 stars on GitHub. This 12.8x difference suggests Fider has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Fider has 876 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Quackback is growing faster, adding 44 stars in the last 30 days (+14%) against adding 40 stars for Fider (+0.9%). Quackback is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Fider last updated 2 days ago and Quackback 5 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Fider uses Golang while Quackback leverages JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Tanstack Start.
Project Maturity
Fider has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Quackback which began 1 year ago. This 9.0-year head start suggests Fider may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Feedback & Feature Request Management.
Hosting & Deployment
Both Fider and Quackback offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.